Belleek taser use “justified” - PSNI Ombudsman

PSNI crest

PSNI crest

The Ombudsman for the Police service of Northern Ireland has found that police were justified in using a Taser to help restrain a man who was threatening to slash his own throat in Belleek last June.

The incident happened after police received a 999 report that a man had a long knife and was outside a house threatening the male householder.

Police also received a call from mans mother, who said he was outside her house and was threatening to kill himself.

When officers went to the scene, the mans mother said he had put the knife back in a kitchen drawer and ran off upon seeing police.

The Ombudsman reported states, that a police Armed Support Unit arrived a short time later and established that he had gone to another house nearby.

Officers from the unit told Police Ombudsman investigators that they spent about five minutes outside the property warning that they would force entry if they were not allowed into the house.

Finally, officers forced entry to the house, despite the efforts of the male and they stated he held a pizza cutter to his throat and threatened to kill himself. He was warned if he did not drop the cutter, a Taser would be used against him. When he failed to comply, an officer fired the weapon.

The man continued to struggle, and officers were unable to remove the barbs discharged by the Taser from his skin at the scene.

He was placed in leg restraints and taken into police custody at Enniskillen.

The use of Taser during the incident was referred by the Chief Constable to the Police Ombudsman for independent investigation.

The officer who discharged the Taser said he had done so in order to minimise the threat posed by Man A to himself, to police officers and other members of the public.

An examination of the officer’s training records showed that he was properly trained in the use of Taser, and records showed that he had been authorised to use the weapon if necessary.

Police Ombudsman, Dr Michael Maguire, concluded that the use of Taser during the incident had been a “justified, necessary and proportionate” means of resolving a volatile and potentially dangerous situation




Back to the top of the page